Pero, esto: "If it makes you moist, there's a good chance that it is pornography under a legal definition"? WTF?
He estudiado un poquito la cuestion de la pronografia de un punto de vista de la literatura. Esta definicion es completamente estupida.
What if someone were to look at a lingerie catalogue and be turned on? Is that pornography?
What about movies which show a bit of (female) skin? Is that pornography?
If we're basing our definition of pornography on the reaction of the *reader* or *viewer*, well, then, the material itself has nothing much do with it, now does it?
(when I get upset, I can't write in Spanish, sorry).
No he leido todo el articulo "The terrible secret of Livejournal"
He estudiado un poquito la cuestion de la pronografia de un punto de vista de la literatura. Esta definicion es completamente estupida.
What if someone were to look at a lingerie catalogue and be turned on? Is that pornography?
What about movies which show a bit of (female) skin? Is that pornography?
If we're basing our definition of pornography on the reaction of the *reader* or *viewer*, well, then, the material itself has nothing much do with it, now does it?
(when I get upset, I can't write in Spanish, sorry).