(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-02 01:19 am (UTC)
ext_24397: (Default)
http://shaggirl.livejournal.com/186106.html?thread=3056122#t3056122

You make an interesting comparison. But my point, of course, is that behavior that is widespread yet seems to be against what would be predicted by cultural values would be more useful for illuminating neural structure.

Romaine, above, evidently a slash fan, points out:

Now while slash isn't under the radar As much as it used to be there are still many valid reasons why it's not in the public like porn. I said this in another place but I will repeat it here: this is not all fun and games. We've lost quite a few authors because of exposure. And some violently so. It's come up in divorce cases and loss of jobs and yes being physically abused.

Lesbian porn does not tend to elicit this reaction.


o.0

Segun el tipo este, el slash porn (entiendase porno gay), es taaaaaaaan radical y taaaaaan perverso, que es normal que sus autores sean castigados por sus gustos, cuando el porno lésbico es natural y aceptable y jamás será satanizado. El punto es : ¿cual es la pinche diferencia? Son dos mujeres teniendo sexo = dos hombres teniendo sexo. ¿O es en la supuesta audiciencia (hombres) en donde esta el valor de diferenciación? Hombre q disfruta porno lésbico =/= mujer que dsifruta porno gay.

What??????
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

logovo1: (Default)
logovo1

October 2009

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags