Oh, you infidel! You say something against JP's looks! *giggles* Seriously, I totally GET THAT! I have these arguments with a friend of mine where she keeps saying that his face and forehead is weirdly unappealing. I have to defend JP's looks! OMG! Hmmm... let's say that he can look good in some shots, not as pretty as Jensen, but very few guys can look like Jensen, who is his teen pictures looks like a freakin Barbie doll. I mean, seriously, it's kind of disturbing.
RM's wankiness... I heard of it and tried to ignore it. Even the whiffs I got were enough to make me look away in embarrassment at the public asshattery, which is so unappealing.
Oh, coming back at JP's looks. I have to say, I have a VERY strong attraction to very tall men. It's - um - a thing I have. I'm not that tall, 1.72m, but in Mexico that was considered freakishly tall and tall men where sort of a rarity. So, yeah, tall men do it for me because they were so rare in RL :)
I have these arguments with a friend of mine where she keeps saying that his face and forehead is weirdly unappealing.
OMG, that's exactly it! To me, he looks like a baby (remember that other discussion?), and it's in partially because his forehead seems to be squished down around his little pea of a nose (I have the same problem with Peter MacNicol). Yeah, it's clearly an aesthetic choice for me - I tend to like high foreheads, high cheekbones, big eyes, long noses, and full mouths, and he's pretty much the opposite of all that. But I get the tall thing, too - I'm really short, just barely over five feet, so anyone is taller than me, and there are some small men who I think are beautiful (more RL than media-wise, because tiny guys rarely make it in commercial contexts). But Eccleston's long legs? Yeah.
There's an anthropological theory that people tend to go for either people who look very much like them (endogamous drive), or who are very different (exogamous), and I'm something like 98% exogamous in my tastes.
Jensen is very pretty, but more attractive now to me, because girly doesn't do it for me ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 11:14 pm (UTC)*giggles*
Seriously, I totally GET THAT! I have these arguments with a friend of mine where she keeps saying that his face and forehead is weirdly unappealing. I have to defend JP's looks! OMG! Hmmm... let's say that he can look good in some shots, not as pretty as Jensen, but very few guys can look like Jensen, who is his teen pictures looks like a freakin Barbie doll. I mean, seriously, it's kind of disturbing.
RM's wankiness... I heard of it and tried to ignore it. Even the whiffs I got were enough to make me look away in embarrassment at the public asshattery, which is so unappealing.
Oh, coming back at JP's looks. I have to say, I have a VERY strong attraction to very tall men. It's - um - a thing I have. I'm not that tall, 1.72m, but in Mexico that was considered freakishly tall and tall men where sort of a rarity. So, yeah, tall men do it for me because they were so rare in RL :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 11:33 pm (UTC)OMG, that's exactly it! To me, he looks like a baby (remember that other discussion?), and it's in partially because his forehead seems to be squished down around his little pea of a nose (I have the same problem with Peter MacNicol). Yeah, it's clearly an aesthetic choice for me - I tend to like high foreheads, high cheekbones, big eyes, long noses, and full mouths, and he's pretty much the opposite of all that. But I get the tall thing, too - I'm really short, just barely over five feet, so anyone is taller than me, and there are some small men who I think are beautiful (more RL than media-wise, because tiny guys rarely make it in commercial contexts). But Eccleston's long legs? Yeah.
There's an anthropological theory that people tend to go for either people who look very much like them (endogamous drive), or who are very different (exogamous), and I'm something like 98% exogamous in my tastes.
Jensen is very pretty, but more attractive now to me, because girly doesn't do it for me ;-)